'Now Jesus was teaching in one of the
synagogues on the sabbath. And just then there appeared a woman with a spirit
that had crippled her for eighteen years. She was bent over and was quite
unable to stand up straight. When Jesus saw her, he called her over and said,
"Woman, you are set free from your ailment." When he laid his hands
on her, immediately she stood up straight and began praising God. But the
leader of the synagogue, indignant because Jesus had cured on the sabbath, kept
saying to the crowd, "There are six days on which work ought to be done;
come on those days and be cured, and not on the sabbath day." But the Lord
answered him and said, "You hypocrites! Does not each of you on the
sabbath untie his ox or his donkey from the manger, and lead it away to give it
water? And ought not this woman, a daughter of Abraham whom Satan bound for
eighteen long years, be set free from this bondage on the sabbath day?"
When he said this, all his opponents were put to shame; and the entire crowd
was rejoicing at all the wonderful things that he was doing.'
--Luke 13: 10-17
Earlier this week a conflict erupted that shook many in this country to their core: Spider-Man is leaving the Marvel Cinematic Universe! I know, I know. Everybody stay calm. Here’s the short version of what happened: Spider-Man’s movie likeness is owned by Sony, who allowed the character to appear in the recent blockbuster Marvel films, which are owned by Disney. When the two corporations could not agree on how to split the profits from those films—or more to the point, when neither would give up their power and control—the deal was broken, and now fans are mourning the uncertainty of Spider-Man’s film future. All because no one wanted to give up their power and control. It’s a sad, sad day.
Spider-Man's reaction to being pulled from the MCU
All kidding aside, it can be argued, as Harvard professor Hugh O’Doherty once said, that all conflict comes down to power and control. Everything from Facebook spats to full-on global confrontations have, at their core, someone with power exerting it over another. As we’ve all seen, in Facebook rants and global confrontations, this never ends well. Human beings, at our core, don’t like feeling threatened, and those of us who hold some kind of power get especially defensive when it is called into question, and we look to our institutional systems, rules, and laws to justify our position and enforce our power, rather than give any of it up.
I must preface all of this by saying that systems, rules, and laws are not by their nature bad things. We do need them, and at their best they are meant to serve all the people, especially the powerless. But what happens when they don’t and are instead used in harmful ways by those seeking to maintain their power and control?
The ministry of Jesus is filled with moments when he confronts those in positions of power and calls them to metanoia, the Greek word we translate as ‘repentance,’ but whose literal definition is ‘a turning around in the right direction.’ Today we find Jesus caught up in one such moment when he heals a woman on the Sabbath, that is on Saturday, only to have a leader of the synagogue erupt in anger. But you may have noticed that his anger is not directed at Jesus for healing on the Sabbath, which, by Law, is not allowed, no, the leader instead chastises the woman and all those coming for healing because they should have known the Law better. You see, Jesus’ move makes the leader look bad and undermines his power, so he turns to Scripture to reinforce his position. It’s a power play, a posture perfectly reflective of someone who feels their power is being threatened, so they resort to a strict, literal interpretation of the rules and laws in order to save face.
An artist's depiction of Jesus healing the woman on the Sabbath
Jesus serves as a model for a different way. Even among those who may not have believed him to be the promised Messiah, Jesus still held a position of authority as a rabbi. Yet not once do we see him attempt to desperately hold on to his position. Instead of exploiting his power like the synagogue leader, he shares it by speaking up for and helping those who cannot do so themselves. Jesus calls the leader and his ilk hypocrites because they play the part of righteous people while trying to control others. His rebuttal, then, implies that this is no mere academic difference of opinion about the interpretation of Torah but a moral issue about the real meaning being the Law, what is going on beneath the literal words. The leader and those like him hide behind the literal words, neglecting their actual meaning. Jesus points out earlier in chapter 6 of Luke’s gospel that such persons cannot perceive their own weakness, nor can they—as he said last week in chapter 12—discern the present evidence of God’s work in the world. They are so tied to their systems, so bent on maintaining their power, that they are blind to the basic fundamental call of God to pay attention to and care for the needs of others.
This is what happens when people are more concerned with maintaining their power and control than they are about actual folks in vulnerable positions. For all the commandments that spoke about mercy and justice for the poor, sick, and lonely, this leader of the faith chooses to focus on one that will maintain his position of authority. He can stand on Exodus, chapter 20 and Deuteronomy, chapter 5 as passages of Torah that support his argument. So, in a manner of speaking, he isn’t wrong from a biblical scholarship standpoint because he can quote the Scriptures, but he is wrong from a theological standpoint because he refuses to see the mercy and justice of God at work in these people who have come to him for aid. While he’s not a Pharisee, he is still so concerned with following the rules that he forgets why they’re there in the first place, and he is so scared of what will happen if someone doesn’t follow the rules that he will disrespect even the dignity of these vulnerable people to maintain power and control.
What makes Jesus such a radical figure for his time—and, quite frankly, for all time—is how he reinterprets power and the purpose of systems, rules, and laws. In Mark, chapter 2, another occasion when he does something he isn’t supposed to do on the Sabbath, he points out that rules and laws are meant to serve people, not the other way around when he comments that the Sabbath was made for humanity, not humanity for the Sabbath. What’s more, as Philippians, chapter 2 says, Jesus does not regard his equality with God—in other words, his power—as something to be exploited, but instead empties himself for the sake of others. It is this emptying—the Greek word is kenosis—that Christianity invites everyone—and I mean EVERYONE—into, making it unlike any other religion that ever had been or has been since. Christianity undoes the idea that the systems, rules, and laws come before the needs of people because Christ himself valued in his earthly ministry the experiences of ordinary, vulnerable, powerless people. He empties himself of his own power and invites us—especially those of us in positions of authority, with power and control over the lives of others—to do the same. This is the bold invitation of Christianity and the reason why everyone thought it would fail, because this faith was radical enough to invite every single kind of person in, and when they joined they let go of the power structures they knew out there, so that all voices, all experiences could be heard and respected. It was a complete reframing of what power looked like, and as a result the early church communities that we read about in the Acts of the Apostles or the letters of Paul were incredibly diverse, perhaps more so than any of our denominations today. Their mission was to serve one another, not maintain a strict adherence to religious laws.
We have seen what becomes of Christian communities that flip those two and focus far too much on maintaining the literal meaning of rules and laws and promoting positions of power and control. In these communities clergy abuse the trust and authority given to them by the people for whom they are supposed to care. In these communities Scriptures about justice and mercy are ignored in favor of literal interpretations of those Scriptures that promote condemnation and hierarchical power structures. In these communities the experiences of young people, folks coming from other traditions, and those marginalized by both society and the institutional church are all swept aside in favor of upholding the status quo. These are communities of faith that are dying, and they will continue to do so as long as they resort to any and all measures for maintaining power and control while treating the journey of faith more like the synagogue leader does and less like Jesus does.
We have seen what becomes of Christian communities that flip those two and focus far too much on maintaining the literal meaning of rules and laws and promoting positions of power and control. In these communities clergy abuse the trust and authority given to them by the people for whom they are supposed to care. In these communities Scriptures about justice and mercy are ignored in favor of literal interpretations of those Scriptures that promote condemnation and hierarchical power structures. In these communities the experiences of young people, folks coming from other traditions, and those marginalized by both society and the institutional church are all swept aside in favor of upholding the status quo. These are communities of faith that are dying, and they will continue to do so as long as they resort to any and all measures for maintaining power and control while treating the journey of faith more like the synagogue leader does and less like Jesus does.
Our friends in the United Church of Christ use a red comma as the symbol of their denomination, just as we use our Episcopal shield. They use a comma because, they say, God is still speaking, still moving. The synagogue leader could not see that. God was moving, even on the sabbath because God is bigger than the Law or any institutional system. God is still speaking, still moving, still calling us to metanoia, to a turning in the right direction, so that we may live into kenosis, that we may empty ourselves and show the world that real power doesn’t look like the power-over version of the faith leader but the power-with version of Jesus. This is the kind of power that brings real Good News to those who so desperately need it. This, my brothers and sisters, is what made Christians different then and still makes them different now. Ours is not a strict religion based on maintaining power and control through rules and laws but rather a way of being grounded in the way of Jesus’ own life, which is meant to permeate all walks of our lives. I wonder what our lives would look like, what our churches would look like, what our business and governments would look like, if we valued the mission to serve the powerless over the maintaining of systems that benefit the powerful. If we could live in such a way, perhaps we can stand in the hopeful reality that God will, in the words of the Collect from Sunday, grant us, through the unity of the Spirit, to show forth God’s power of justice, mercy, and love among all people.
No comments:
Post a Comment